In this instance, we have the people of the state condemning Socrates and the Laws of the state following suit and persuading Socrates that he must face death in order to avoid breaking them. Are all our former admissions which were made within a few days to be thrown away?
He knows me because I often come, Socrates; moreover. Or do you decline and dissent from this? Socrates jokingly suggests that if he were to get what he deserves, he should be honored with a great meal for being of such service to the state.
Nowhere does Socrates give reason to think the god obeys what and only what the laws say. Though I will already have given reasons for thinking that Socrates speaks as the Laws in order to prompt Crito to a certain postmortem—namely, to present an opposing speech of equivalent force—in the fifth section I enumerate how the ways in which Socrates speaks and situates the Speech of the Laws show him not to endorse it.
And he ought to fear the censure and welcome the praise of that one only, and not of the many? Socrates responds no more. There can be no doubt about the meaning Crito, I think.
I have nothing to say, Socrates. Crito wants Socrates to remain alive: Could we live, having an evil and corrupted body?
Socrates can be surprised that the jailer let Crito in only if Socrates believes the jailer has a strong commitment to the rules; Crito explains that this commitment was bested by friendly familiarity and by a favor. I suppose that the ship has come from Delos, on the arrival of which I am to die?
Tell us what complaint you have to make against us which justifies you in attempting to destroy us and the State? Then why did you sit and say nothing, instead of at once awakening me?
Well, I will not dispute about that; but please to tell me, Socrates, whether you are not acting out of regard to me and your other friends: Crito is deeply attached as a friend to Socrates.
It seems he could be examining Crito, finding out for Crito what Crito believes. Do I not desert the principles which were acknowledged by us to be just—what do you say? For now it suffices to appreciate the ways friendship gives Crito reasons to act.
Socrates worries instead that he is eager for the wrong thing. The other considerations which you mention, of money and loss of character, and the duty of educating children, are, I fear, only the doctrines of the multitude, who would be as ready to call people to life, if they were able, as they are to put them to death- and with as little reason.
Why does Socrates use the voice of the Laws rather than his own voice?
Do you imagine that a state can subsist and not be overthrown, in which the decisions of law have no power, but are set aside and trampled upon by individuals? Was the disciple in gymnastics supposed to attend to the praise and blame and opinion of every man, or of one man only- his physician or trainer, whoever that was?
In the first place did we not bring you into existence? But you pretended that you preferred death to exile compare Apol. Socrates has made no other indications that he himself needs to be purified. A person can be persuaded in opposite directions about some matter if persuaders can remind him, serially, of different and potentially inconsistent subsets of his beliefs.
And because we think right to destroy you, do you think that you have any right to destroy us in return, and your country as far as in you lies? Do the laws speak truly, or do they not?Summary Plato's The Apology is an account of the speech Socrates makes at the trial in which he is charged with not recognizing the gods recognized by the state, inventing new deities, and corrupting the youth of Athens.
Socrates' speech, however, is by no means an "apology" in our modern understanding of the word. The name of the dialogue derives.
In this dialogue, Socrates implores Crito to establish a. common ground. of agreement so they can. decide together.
what ought to be done. Recall that. rationality. is the movement from what you know, to what you didn’t. Socratic Persuasion in the Crito Christopher Moore I do not see evidence elsewhere in the dialogue that Crito does not believe what he sets out in these nine reasons, or that he’s even ambivalent about them.
Nor does Socrates have a monopoly on talking about morality. In response to Crito’s question about whether Socrates has been.
Reading Analysis Paper: Dialogue Between Crito And Socrates (Essay Sample) Instructions: Analysis Paper on a Reading Name Institution Date Analysis paper on a reading According to the dialogue between Crito and Socrates, the conversation portrays Socrates as an upright person who is unjustly persecuted.
Socrates does not want to. Plato's "Crito" STUDY. PLAY. Why does Crito have nothing to say at the end of the dialogue? Socrates is so absolute that Crito is overwhelmed.
Why is it wrong to escape from Athens? Socrates has chosen to live in Athens. Analysis and Themes. Though brief, the Crito is a confusing and somewhat muddled dialogue. The difficulty Plato faced in composing the dialogue was to somehow justify Socrates' decision to stay in prison rather than try to .Download