The government should rightly have no say in what you intake. Consumers need to see the affects unhealthy foods have on their bodies. I agree with his stance. Although I feel that consumers should take some responsibility.
Judith Warner encourages the government to make an effort to change the culture of food in order to end obesity in America. The government made rationing a way for Americans to show patriotism and support for their country.
This is something I disagree with because although the health of others does not directly affect me; I believe it is an important issue to address because such large numbers of people in our country as a whole are struggling with this issue.
I believe that there has been a huge drop in parental — and by extension — personal responsibility in the diets American kids consume. Because of this I see it reasonable for health insurers to charge more to obese clients.
The government should be involved in the health of its citizens. By making unhealthy foods less readily available, making healthier choices become easier.
People should see food as a means of nourishment not comfort. If the government were to limit the unhealthy foods that are in the market consumers will be much more likely to choose healthier alternatives. He argues that obesity should be taken out of the public health sector to force people to pay for their own medical needs, as it would make them more responsible in terms of what they put into their mouths.
Where this agreement usually ends, however, is on the question of what role our government should play in the effort to end the obesity epidemic. Everyone chooses what he or she eats and as a result has to has to deal with the consequences. This is something I can agree with.
By making healthy food more available more people may be inclined to purchase healthier foods. Whether you believe it should be a personal responsibility or a government effort, I think we can all agree that something needs to be done. I believe better choices can be made if we stop worrying about what everyone else is eating, and that the government should stay firmly out of this matter.
Obesity causes my health problems that may not be present in an average weight individual. Obesity in America seems to be a huge controversy, and data shows that America is one of the most obese countries in the world and have a large obesity related diseases that come with it.
Ultimately, Balko insists the way to tackle the obesity crisis is through less government intervention and more personal responsibility. However, the health care system is still a ways off of complete responsibility for your own well-being.
If we choose not to care about the health of our people, nobody will.
What Judith Warner is trying to say here is that many things need to be taken into consideration when making the effort to end obesity in America. Doing what is good for you should make you feel excellent. I also agree with Warner that changing the way people see food is very important to decreasing obesity.
The government must make the effort to better the lives of its people. In my opinion, removing some of the harmful food products from the market is a step in the accurate direction.
Furthermore, by placing stricter standards on food will mean better products will be present for consumers. As the land of the free, people should have the freedom to eat what they want, but rightly face the consequences to their bodies for doing so.
Warner believes that in order to end obesity the government must change the way we see food. I believe that the government should do their best to enable its people to make the right choices.
Radley Balko and Judith Warner have very distinct ideas of what needs to be done to end obesity in America. In my opinion, school boards banning soda on campus and in vending machines and schools suggesting healthy alternatives to unhealthy food is a good thing.
The government should make more of a effort to educate Americans on the foods they are putting into their bodies. I agree with Balko that people have to take responsibility for what they choose to consume and the consequences of those choices.
Balko claims that government intervention will create more and more federal restrictions on consumer choice.In Radley Balko’s essay, “What you eat is your own Business’, he argues that to solve the national epidemic of obesity, people need to be more in control of their own health.
Radley Balko says in his article, “What You Eat Is Your Business”, that the government is trying, but the steps that they are taking are going in the wrong direction. Main Idea Although many people believe that more regulations by the government on how we eat would be beneficial, the American culture has become very reliant and it would.
“What You Eat Is Your Business,” by Radley Balko In the article of Radley Balko, he considers obesity a problem in the nation. Balko believes that it is unhealthy for children to be eating bad food but it’s their choices to eat that food.
After analyzing Radley Balko's article, "What You Eat Is Your Business," I would like to give my explanation of why this article should be posted in the next edition of "The Shorthorn." Considering the rhetorical appeals of Balko's article, I believe that most readers of "The Shorthorn" would be 4/4(3).
What You Eat Is Your Business Summary What Radley Balko indicated in his article is that people should be responsible for their own food. The government and health insurance companies should not be involved on what a person eats or how much exercise a person gets because this is an individual choice.
In Radley Balko’s view “It’s difficult to think of anything more private and of less public concern than what we choose to put in our bodies.” The essence of Balko’s argument is that it is no one’s business but our own what we eat.Download